Abdel Moneim Suleiman, editor-in-chief of Sudan Peace Tracker, stated that the complaint lodged by the Sudanese army authorities is merely baseless accusations lacking any credible evidence to substantiate their false claims. He pointed out that this legal action represents a feeble attempt by the Sudanese armed forces to distract attention from the ongoing catastrophic conflict in Sudan and their accountability for the situation, which has resulted in the death and displacement of over 12 million Sudanese. The humanitarian crisis has led to widespread famine, as reported by international organizations indicating that 3 million Sudanese are suffering from severe hunger.
He elaborated that the military authorities in Port Sudan, supported by political Islam factions and the extremist Muslim Brotherhood, have utilized this lawsuit as a pretext for political and media mobilization against the United Arab Emirates. This is a response to the UAE’s pivotal role in exposing the terrorist organization’s plans at various levels and its systematic practices aimed at inciting discord and conflict, threatening the safety and stability of communities.
These comments were made during a discussion session hosted by the Anwar Gargash Diplomatic Academy in Abu Dhabi, titled “The Reality of Sudan: Between Narrative and Authority.” Suleiman provided a comprehensive analysis of the ongoing crisis in Sudan, delving into the background of the conflict and exploring its political, social, and humanitarian dimensions, highlighting the implications of the strife on relief efforts, amidst what is regarded as one of the largest humanitarian crises in the world.
Suleiman noted that international reports detailing violations committed by Sudanese armed forces are clear documents condemning the military’s actions, exposing their crimes. Meanwhile, the armed forces continue to attack the UAE without any substantiated evidence supporting their accusations, relying on vague claims such as “someone told us” or “we heard from others.”
He also pointed out that the “Muslim Brotherhood in Sudan” has been using the Sudanese army as a means to regain power, as the organization continues to propagate hate speech and incite against the Rapid Support Forces, which support calls for democratic transition and peaceful power transfer.
Suleiman emphasized that these actions are part of a calculated strategy by the organization aimed at preserving their influence through continuous conflict. He added that the “Brotherhood leaders” have opted for a military solution as the sole option to eliminate the Rapid Support Forces and subdue the population by force.
He stressed that the Muslim Brotherhood cannot sustain itself outside of power, indicating their lack of belief in the principle of power rotation. This is evident from their past experience during the rule of ousted president Omar al-Bashir, where the group decided to abandon him as their official face, while ensuring that the organization’s presence remained embedded within military institutions and leadership, facilitating their return to power. He noted the necessity of linking the cessation of hostilities to a political process that leads to the formation of a democratic government, mentioning that halting the conflict without such a process would allow the Muslim Brotherhood to regain leadership once again.